Screens at night: what we know and what else matters
AI-generated content. How we make it
In brief
- A screen could cost you sleep through its light, through what you do on it, through the time it takes away from the night or through its notifications.32 In healthy young adults, the measured effects of light and of content have almost always been small, and sometimes nil.167910
- Several authors suggest that time matters more: the screen pushes back bedtime while the time you get up stays fixed. That's an interpretation of surveys and short experiments, not something that has been demonstrated.93
- Night mode hasn't shown any improvement: in a trial with 167 young people, sleep didn't differ between using the phone with it, using it without it or not using it.11 Whether glasses that filter blue light improve sleep isn't known.12
- In a pilot trial with 38 students who slept poorly, those who put their phone away 30 minutes before going to bed went from taking about 31 minutes to fall asleep to about 18, according to their diary; the other group, from 29 to 27.13 Our inference: look first at what time you put screens away, rather than at what color they glow.
“No screens for an hour before bed” is a much-repeated piece of sleep advice. In Sleep better without complicating your routine we explain that, as a blanket ban for adults, it's less well demonstrated than is usually assumed, without that meaning screens are harmless.
Here we go further: through which pathways a screen could affect sleep, what studies with adults have measured, what is known about filters and what to try. In children and adolescents, the evidence is different.1
Several pathways, and they don't carry the same weight
Researchers propose four pathways through which using screens in bed could worsen sleep,3 and a 2024 theoretical review concludes that the relationship is more complex than was thought.2 The table summarizes what has been found in adults.
| Pathway | What is proposed | What studies with adults have found |
|---|---|---|
| Light | The screen's light holds back melatonin and shifts the body clock later.3 | Changes in melatonin and sleepiness; in the time taken to fall asleep, small or no effects, except with long, bright exposures.6781 |
| Content | What you watch or do stirs up mind and body and delays sleep.3 | Half an hour of social media or several episodes of a suspense series barely changed sleep in the laboratory.910 |
| Time | The screen takes up sleep time and pushes back bedtime.3 | In a large survey, more time on screens once in bed is associated with less self-reported sleep; it doesn't prove that it's the cause.3 |
| Notifications | Notifications interrupt sleep that has already begun.3 | None of the sources of this article measure it in adults. |
Light: measurable effects, almost always small
We summarize the most cited experiment, with four hours of a tablet at maximum brightness over five nights, in the weakest sleep rules. With more everyday exposures, the results have been more modest:
- Half an hour in bed, at home. In Norway, 16 students (average age 25) read for 30 minutes in bed, on a tablet or on paper, on different nights, with a recording of brain activity (polysomnography) at home. With the tablet more light reached them (about 58 lux versus 27), they were less sleepy when they turned off the light, and slow-wave activity, an indicator of sleep pressure, was delayed by about 30 minutes and was lower at the start of the night. But they didn't take longer to fall asleep, nor did the time spent in each sleep stage change.6
- Two hours, after a day with plenty of light. In Sweden, 14 people spent six and a half hours in bright light (about 569 lux) and then read from 9:00 to 11:00 p.m. on a tablet or on paper. Neither sleep, recorded with polysomnography, nor melatonin before sleep differed between the two. The authors suggest that daylight might cushion the effect of the screen and call for larger studies.7
- Which part of the light. In Switzerland, 72 healthy men aged 18 to 35 spent three and a half hours looking at an experimental screen, each at one of four brightness levels; the screen reduced, in a way not noticeable to the naked eye, the part of the light that acts most on the body clock. With less of that light they were sleepier and melatonin rose earlier, by about half an hour at three of the four levels; but only at the highest brightness did they clearly fall asleep sooner.8
A National Sleep Foundation expert panel, in a 2024 consensus, points out that the effects of light observed were usually small or came from laboratory designs not much like everyday use. As possible reasons why adults seem less sensitive than children and adolescents, it points to the adult eye (smaller pupils, a less transparent lens), daylight moderating the effect of light at night, or a lack of studies.1 That daylight protects against light at night hasn't been demonstrated; we explain it in daylight and sleep routines.
What you do on the screen
The other usual suspect is content: a tense conversation or a gripping series could stir you up just when it's time to wind down. Two experiments from the University of Fribourg (Switzerland), in a sleep laboratory with healthy young people, don't fit the most alarmist view:
- Social media. 32 volunteers used social media for 30 minutes right before sleeping, with the effect of blue light excluded; on other nights they did muscle relaxation or nothing in particular. According to the study's abstract, social media didn't significantly increase arousal or substantially alter sleep, measured or self-reported; it only reduced one stage of light sleep. Relaxation, by contrast, shortened the time taken to fall asleep and improved sleep efficiency.9
- Suspense series. 50 young people (average age 23) watched three or four episodes in a row of a suspense series and, on another night, of a neutral one. The suspense increased stress, heart rate and cortisol before going to bed, but they fell asleep somewhat sooner, and neither the sleep stages nor awakenings changed. Heart rate stayed somewhat higher during the first two sleep cycles, and with episodes that ended on a cliffhanger there was a subtle change in brain activity during sleep.10
The authors of the social media study conclude that its most notable effect seems to be the extra time spent on it.9 And the 2024 panel didn't reach a consensus on content in adults, although it did for children and adolescents.1
The time the screen takes away from the night
The simplest pathway is time: while you're still on the screen you're not sleeping, and since the time you get up is usually set by work or studies, the night gets shorter.9 This is what's called sleep displacement.3
A national survey of more than 45,000 Norwegian university students aged 18 to 28 found that, among those who used screens in bed, each additional hour of screen time after going to bed was associated with 59% higher odds of having insomnia symptoms, according to a questionnaire (odds are a way of expressing probability that these studies use; they're not equivalent to “59% more likely”), and with 24 minutes less self-reported sleep. The association was similar for social media and for other activities, and the authors read this as support for displaced time mattering more than content.3 But it's a cross-sectional study: it can't tell which comes first, and the authors themselves point out that people who sleep poorly may use the screen to pass the time or to help themselves fall asleep,3 a reverse direction that the 2024 theoretical review builds into its model.2
With adults of all ages, the picture is less clear. In a representative telephone survey of 1,342 adults in Canada, those who used screens at bedtime less than once a week and those who did so five nights or more a week reported the best overall sleep health.4 In another, of 844 adults in Flanders (Belgium), texting or calling with the light already off was associated with taking longer to fall asleep and with less efficient sleep.5
Night mode, filters and glasses: what has been tested
Is changing the color of the light enough? The two most direct studies we've found don't allow us to say so:
- The phone's night mode. In a trial with 167 students at a university in the United States, aged 18 to 24, randomly assigned for seven nights to using their phone in the hour before going to bed with night mode on, without it, or not using it, sleep estimated with a wrist sensor wasn't different among the three groups; nor between using the phone and not using it, so overall there was no effect for night mode to correct. In an exploratory analysis, among those who slept more than 6.8 hours on average, not using the phone gave the best sleep efficiency and the least time awake.11
- Glasses that filter blue light. A 2023 Cochrane review brought together 17 trials with adults. On sleep, six trials with 148 participants from different populations gave contradictory results: three with improvements and three with no differences. With very low certainty, it concludes that it isn't known whether these glasses improve sleep more than ordinary lenses.12
In the laboratory, reducing the part of the light that acts most on the body clock did change melatonin and sleepiness,8 but that doesn't guarantee better sleep at home, and a phone's color setting isn't that experimental screen. Our reading: night mode hasn't been shown to improve adults' sleep, so it's best not to treat it as a solution.
What to try if you suspect your screens
According to the 2024 panel, strategies to reduce screen use at night have given mixed results, with many studies showing no effect, although those targeting interactive use at night tended to work; and most of the studies it reviewed were done with adolescents.1 Of the trials with adults we've reviewed, the one closest to practical advice asked people to put their phone away before sleeping. In that pilot trial, carried out in China, 38 university students who slept poorly according to a questionnaire and usually used their phone for more than half an hour at bedtime were randomly split into two groups: one put the phone away 30 minutes before their usual bedtime for four weeks, with the phone locked or switched off and checks by the researchers; the other received no instructions.13
Figure 1. Minutes they took to fall asleep, according to their diary, at the start and at the end
According to their diary, that group also slept somewhat longer (from 6.2 to 6.6 hours on average; the other, from 6.5 to 6.3) and improved on a sleep quality questionnaire.13
What follows is our suggestion, not the protocol of any study:
- See what the screen takes from you. For a week, note what time you put it away and what time you turn off the light in a simple sleep diary. If it pushes back your bedtime while the time you get up doesn't move, you already have a clue.
- Change just one thing. For example, the time you put your phone away, decided as a concrete plan: “if it's 11 p.m., the phone stays charging outside the bedroom.” That's an “if–then” plan.
- Silence notifications at night. Interrupting sleep is one of the proposed pathways,3 although we haven't found studies with adults that measure it.
- Give it a few weeks and don't rely only on your impression. How to do it, in a personal test in three steps.
If what keeps you on the screen is that you can't fall asleep, the screen may be more a consequence than the cause.2 If difficulty sleeping lasts for weeks or affects your daily life, see a health professional: when it's worth doing so.
Keep reading
Sleep better without complicating your routine
Which popular sleep rules, from screens to naps, are weaker than they seem, and which habits have more support.
Daylight and sleep routines: what is worth understanding
How daylight and light at night move the body clock, and why it hasn't been shown that one makes up for the other.
How to keep a simple sleep diary
How to note each morning what time you went to bed and fell asleep, to see whether a change like putting your phone away earlier works for you.
How to turn a wellness data point into a question and a test
How to approach a change as a personal test, to find out whether it really works for you without fooling yourself about the result.
Want to turn information into action?
naro helps you prioritize 2–3 high-potential habits and sustain them over time, with context and follow-up.
Sources
Each small number in the text leads to the source that statement rests on. Practical advice without a number is a deduction from these sources, and examples with a person's name are made up. It is general information: it does not replace an assessment by a health professional. How we make this content
Sources consulted up to 3 November 2026.
- Expert consensus. Hartstein LE, Mathew GM, Reichenberger DA, et al. (2024). The impact of screen use on sleep health across the lifespan: A National Sleep Foundation consensus statement. Sleep Health. Panel of 16 experts that reviewed 35 experimental or intervention studies; of the 16 that included adults, 14 focused on people under 30. Read in the accepted manuscript version.
- Theoretical review. Bauducco S, Pillion M, Bartel K, et al. (2024). A bidirectional model of sleep and technology use: A theoretical review of How much, for whom, and which mechanisms. Sleep Medicine Reviews. Proposes a model; it doesn't pool data. One of the authors runs a company that provides training on sleep disorders and works for a company with a sleep-tracking app. We could only read the abstract.
- Cross-sectional study. Hjetland GJ, Skogen JC, Hysing M, et al. (2025). How and when screens are used: comparing different screen activities and sleep in Norwegian university students. Frontiers in Psychiatry. National survey of Norwegian students aged 18 to 28 in 2022, with a 35% response rate; self-reported data. One of the authors has worked for two companies in the sleep sector, one of them with a sleep-tracking app.
- Cross-sectional study. Vézina-Im LA, Morin CM, Chen S, et al. (2025). The complex association between bedtime screen use and adult sleep health. Sleep Health. Telephone survey of 1,342 adults in Canada, weighted to the census; self-reported data. We could only read the abstract.
- Cross-sectional study. Exelmans L, Van den Bulck J (2016). Bedtime mobile phone use and sleep in adults. Social Science & Medicine. Survey of 844 adults in Flanders aged 18 to 94; self-reported data. We could only read the abstract.
- Crossover trial. Grønli J, Byrkjedal IK, Bjorvatn B, et al. (2016). Reading from an iPad or from a book in bed: the impact on human sleep. A randomized controlled crossover trial. Sleep Medicine. 16 students, sleep recorded at home; one night of each condition. We could only read the abstract.
- Crossover experimental study. Rångtell FH, Ekstrand E, Rapp L, et al. (2016). Two hours of evening reading on a self-luminous tablet vs. reading a physical book does not alter sleep after daytime bright light exposure. Sleep Medicine. 14 people in a laboratory; one night of each condition. We could only read the abstract.
- Experimental study. Schöllhorn I, Stefani O, Lucas RJ, et al. (2023). Melanopic irradiance defines the impact of evening display light on sleep latency, melatonin and alertness. Communications Biology. 72 healthy men aged 18 to 35, 18 per brightness level, with a laboratory display prototype; not generalizable to women, adolescents or older people. Several authors hold patents or patent applications on displays or lighting, among them one for a display with an effect on the body clock.
- Experimental study. Combertaldi SL, Ort A, Cordi M, et al. (2021). Pre-sleep social media use does not strongly disturb sleep: a sleep laboratory study in healthy young participants. Sleep Medicine. 32 healthy young people in a sleep laboratory. We could only read the abstract.
- Experimental study. Baselgia S, Combertaldi SL, Fahr A, et al. (2023). Pre-sleep arousal induced by suspenseful series and cliffhangers have only minor effects on sleep: A sleep laboratory study. Sleep Medicine. 50 healthy young people, 39 of them women, in a sleep laboratory. We could only read the abstract.
- Randomized trial. Duraccio KM, Zaugg KK, Blackburn RC, Jensen CD (2021). Does iPhone night shift mitigate negative effects of smartphone use on sleep outcomes in emerging adults?. Sleep Health. 167 university students aged 18 to 24 over seven nights; sleep estimated with a wrist sensor. Cited for its result, not as an assessment of a brand. We could only read the abstract.
- Systematic review. Singh S, Keller PR, Busija L, et al. (2023). Blue-light filtering spectacle lenses for visual performance, sleep, and macular health in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 17 trials; for sleep, six trials with 148 participants and very low certainty.
- Randomized pilot trial. He JW, Tu ZH, Xiao L, et al. (2020). Effect of restricting bedtime mobile phone use on sleep, arousal, mood, and working memory: A randomized pilot trial. PLOS ONE. 38 students in China with poor sleep quality; unblinded and with self-reported data.